© 2024 Marfa Public Radio
A 501(c)3 non-profit organization.

Lobby Hours: Monday - Friday 10 AM to Noon & 1 PM to 4 PM
For general inquiries: (432) 729-4578
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
We're continuing to experience intermittent technical problems with our KOJP signal. We apologize for the inconvenience.

U.S. Supreme Court Rules In Favor OF DACA Recipients, Says Trump Administration's Move To Overturn It Was Arbitrary

REUTERS / Jonathan Ernst
People gathered outside the U.S. Supreme Court in November 2019 as the justices heard oral arguments on the Trump administration’s bid to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program in Washington D.C.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against the Trump administration's efforts to end the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, declaring in a 5-to-4 opinion that the 2012 initiative was inappropriately terminated by the Trump administration.

The court's decision comes nearly three years after Trump announced he was terminating the policy, known as DACA, that has protected more than 130,000 Texans from deportation since its inception, the second-highest total of any state after California. As of December 2019, there were about 107,000 Texans with DACA permits, according to federal  statistics.

Trump's reason for ending the program echoed what many Republicans, including  some in Texas, said when it was enacted: immigration law is under the purview of the U.S. Congress and that former President Barack Obama exceeded his authority when he initially enacted DACA.

The program has provided a legal shield to hundreds of thousands of immigrants who were brought into the U.S. as children; it was open to undocumented immigrants who came to the country before they were 16 and who were 30 or younger as of June 2012. The program gave them a renewable, two-year work permit and a reprieve from deportation.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the opinion that the justices did not consider whether the program itself was legal when implemented in 2012, but instead they considered whether the Trump administration followed proper procedure when it ended DACA.

“We address only whether the agency complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action,” he  wrote. “Here the agency failed to consider the conspicuous issues of whether to retain forbearance and what if anything to do about the hardship to DACA recipients.”

Immigrant rights groups and Texas Democrats immediately cheered the decision.

“This is a major win for both individuals and families who have spent years fighting for justice,” the El Paso-based Border Network for Human Rights said in a statement. “In light of unprecedented economic and health inequities facing our black and brown communities, this victory illustrates progress towards more inclusive and pro-immigrant policies.”

“It is fiercely American to look out and protect one another. Our DREAMers have always deserved the same protections as anybody else and now they will get those protections they deserve. We applaud the Supreme Court for making the right decision," added Gilberto Hinojosa, the chairman of the Texas Democratic Party.

But supporters of the program also warned the celebrations will be temporary as a permanent legislative fix is still needed.

“Today, the U.S. Supreme Court made the right decision by standing alongside these young immigrants and allowing the DACA program to continue,” said state Rep. Rafael Anchia, D-Dallas, the chairman of the Mexican American Legislative Caucus. “Unfortunately, this extension is still temporary and permanent legislative action from Congress is needed.”

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement that his office would keep fighting to have DACA declared unconstitutional in a separate case filed in Texas’ federal courts.

“We are disappointed in today’s SCOTUS decision but it does not resolve the underlying issue that president Obama’s original executive order exceeded his constitutional authority we look forward to continue litigating the issue our case now pending in the southern district of Texas,” he said.

Paxton’s office successfully stopped a similar 2014 Obama-era program that would have expanded DACA benefit to millions of adults.

Jaqueline Watson, an Austin-based immigration attorney who’s been aiding DACA applicants since the program was first announced, said the decision was unexpected and a welcome relief. But she added that the Trump administration could try again, though it would be a race against the clock before the November election.

“It’s time consuming, that’s the thing. Public notice and comment, it’s set out in the [Administrative Procedures Act],” she said. “it’s doable, but who knows how much time that would take. But it also opens the process up to more litigation.”

Ali Noorani, the  executive director of the National Immigration Forum, said he expects Trump to try to end DACA  again, but the real focus in now on Congress to pass legislation permanently protects DACA recipients.

“I think Trump is the only Republican who thinks that rescinding DACA is good politics. And I can definitely see that Trump and the [White House advisor] Stephen Miller faction restarting the process,” he said. “That’s why I don’t think Congress is let off the hook. There is deep bipartisan support across the county for the program.”

This is a developing story and will be updated.

From The Texas Tribune